[BCNnet] Re: Virginia, A Logged Forest Is Not a Healthy Forest
Gmurphy6@aol.com
Gmurphy6@aol.com
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 09:42:37 EDT
In a message dated 8/28/02 2:46:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
jane_danowitz@ourforests.org writes:
<< Last week, in a politically motivated response to this
summer's wildfires, President Bush announced his Healthy
Forests Initiative, a plan to weaken environmental
safeguards and limit public input in the name of fire
prevention.
President Bush wants to "streamline" or more accurately
rollback the backbone of environmental protections,
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which
was signed into law in 1970 by President Nixon. Under
NEPA federal agencies are required to produce an Environmental
Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
which outlines the details of a project and several
alternatives to a proposed project. NEPA requires the
EA or EIS to explain the environmental impacts of a
proposed project in order to give federal land managers
the best scientific information on which they base
their decisions concerning our national forests.
The Bush plan would allow logging projects, masked
as fire prevention measures to skip the NEPA process,
a misguided concept the timber industry and certain
members of Congress have been attempting to push through
for years. Dismantling NEPA would eliminate the public's
opportunity to participate in many federal land projects
and remove safeguards that ensure that public lands
managers understand what impacts a particular project
will have on our increasing threatened wild forests.
While the Bush plan serves as a boon to corporate special
interests, it fails to protect communities from fire.
Additionally, Bush's plan would open millions of acres
of national forest land to logging projects, under
the guise of forest fire management.
An effective wildfire policy would address the problem
where it exists, in forest communities and neighborhoods,
not in remote forest wildlands. Under his plan, President
Bush will allow his friends in the timber industry
access to large, old trees -- which happen to be the
most fire resistant trees -- located in the remote
backcountry, miles away from the nearest community.
Essentially, the President is suggesting that the best
way to protect our forests is to log our forests.
We believe that Senators Larry Craig and Pete Domenici,
long time friends of the timber industry and foes of
NEPA, will introduce a version of President Bush's
plan as soon as the Senate returns from the Labor Day
holiday. Time is short, and we know many of you are
on vacation, but we need to hear from you today! Please,
join me right now in telling your Senators that we
need responsible forest fire management. Because once
our last wild forests are gone, they're gone forever...
As always, thanks and best wishes.
Jane Danowitz, Director
Heritage Forests Campaign
You can take action on this alert either via email
(please see directions below) or via the web at:
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/healthy_forests/wbukxg4h78xie7
Visit the web address below to tell your friends about
this.
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/healthy_forests/forward/wbukxg4h78xie7
INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:
If you have access to a web browser, you can take action
on this alert by going to the following URL:
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/healthy_forests/wbukxg4h78xie7
INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:
Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email
program.
Your letter will be addressed and sent to:
Your Senators
----THIS LETTER WILL BE SENT IN YOUR NAME----
Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],
I strongly oppose President Bush's "Healthy Forests
Initiative." This cynical, industry backed plan will
not protect communities from fire, but rather will
allow timber companies to extract old, large trees
from any national forest area deemed a fire "threat"
by industry-friendly administration officials. Forest
fire fighting and prevention should be concentrated
in communities and neighborhoods where people would
be most affected by fires, not in remote forest areas
many miles away from the nearest community.
The Administration's plan also calls for "streamlining"
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for thinning
projects that are considered an "emergency." NEPA is
the backbone of environmental protective legislation
and serves a crucial role by providing federal decision-makers
the proper scientific and cultural information needed
to make an informed decision about public lands projects.
NEPA also allows the public to participate in public
lands decisions, which I consider of vital importance.
Furthermore, procedures already exist within NEPA for
expediting emergency federal projects.
President Bush's plan for reducing wildfires does not
protect communities or forests and is a simple case
of "the cure being worse than the disease." We can
protect homes and communities without sacrificing the
health of our forest ecosystems.
Science, and many policy makers, agree on this point.
In fact, the administration endorsed the landmark,
collaborative, science-based fire management strategy
crafted by the Western Governors' Association last
May. All parties who signed the plan, including Secretary
of Interior Gale Norton and Agriculture Secretary Ann
Venemann, agreed that fire risks could be reduced without
any change to existing law.
A version of President Bush's "Healthy Forests Initiative"
is expected to appear as an amendment on the Senate
Interior Appropriations bill shortly after the Labor
Day recess. I urgently ask, for the health of our national
forests and the safety of communities near forests,
that you oppose this amendment and any other legislative
attempts to rollback NEPA protections for our national
forests.
Thank you for your time and careful consideration on
this very important issue.
----END OF LETTER TO BE SENT----
Sincerely,
Virginia Murphy
Belleville, Illinois
Gmurphy6@AOL.com
>>