[BCNnet] BCNnet: Downtown turbines are a bad idea
Birdchris at aol.com
Birdchris at aol.com
Tue Jan 24 21:52:31 CST 2006
Bird rescue monitors rarely find true grassland specialist birds like
Henslowe's, LeConte's, Sharp-tailed or Grasshopper Sparrows, Eastern Meadowlarks,
longspurs, grassland buntings, etc. dead or injured downtown.
I have no idea what's behind this phenomenon, but I've been rescuing birds
formally with CBCM since 2001 and before that on my own since 1988 and I've
never found true grassland species in trouble or dead in the loop or north of
the river, except one Short-eared Owl that was in a bad place (perhaps more
lost than injured since it was alert and flew away safely to the west).
But plenty of other species of all kinds are found (from American Coot to
Orchard Oriole) and adding yet one more danger, even a potential danger, to the
downtown area is a big mistake.
In 18 years of working downtown, I've picked up literally thousands of
injured birds to move them to a place of safety and seen/salvaged for the Field
equal numbers of dead birds, and I cannot reconcile myself to these turbines.
I've read the research and understand the arguments in favor of clean energy,
but I stand firm: I've had furious arguments with Sierra Club people who
think it's ok to sacrifice birds for clean energy sources. Providing clean energy
must not create a hazard for birds and bats. If the technology can't be
proven safe, then the technology needs to be placed off the fly-way and the
energy transported where it's needed. Moving energy around on the ground is going
to be 100% safer for birds.
Please note that these are my own opinions and don't reflect the official
view of the rescue monitoring organization.
Christine Williamson
Chicago/Cook
_birdchris at aol.com_ (mailto:birdchris at aol.com)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://screamer.ece.iit.edu/pipermail/bcnnet/attachments/20060124/1c321662/attachment.html
More information about the bcnnet
mailing list