From donniebird@yahoo.com Mon Dec 2 19:08:51 2002 From: donniebird@yahoo.com (Donald R. Dann) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:08:51 -0600 Subject: [BCNnet] "Top Ten Charities You've Never Heard Of" Message-ID: <002201c29a36$40aaebd0$7f67f90c@donnie> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C29A03.F6107BD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi BCN friends: As many of you know, the American Bird Conservancy ( www.abcbirds.org ) is the only bird conservation group in the Americas whose work is exclusively devoted to the protection of birds and their habitats. Now, an impartial charity ranking organization, Charity Navigator, gave them a 4-star rating and put them in their current top ten list of lesser-known non-profits. If there were a way to rank program performance, I think they would rank even higher Check out this link: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/topten.detail/lstid/7.htm Membership starts at $18.00 a year so if you are not yet a member, it is a wonderful way to support conservation. It is also a great Christmas gift for any birder (see their website, above). Donald R. Dann Highland Park/Lake County ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C29A03.F6107BD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi BCN = friends:

 

As many of you know, the = American Bird Conservancy (www.abcbirds.org) = is the only bird conservation group in the Americas whose work is exclusively = devoted to the protection of birds and their = habitats.

 

Now, an impartial charity = ranking organization, = Charity Navigator, gave them a 4-star rating and put them in their current top = ten list of lesser-known non-profits.=A0 = If there were a way to rank program performance, I think they would rank even = higher

 

Check = out this link:

 

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/topten.detail/lstid= /7.htm

 

Membersh= ip starts at $18.00 a year so if you are not yet a member, it is a wonderful way = to support conservation.=A0 =A0It is also a great Christmas gift = for any birder (see their website, above).=A0 = =A0=A0

 

Donald R. Dann

Highland Park/Lake County=A0 =

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C29A03.F6107BD0-- From donniebird@yahoo.com Thu Dec 5 23:01:49 2002 From: donniebird@yahoo.com (Donald R. Dann) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:01:49 -0600 Subject: [BCNnet] ABC on NPR Morning Edition Message-ID: <004001c29cb2$4bbf3890$7f67f90c@donnie> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C29C80.0124C890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi BCN friends- The American Bird Conservancy has been working hard to minimize bird deaths at communication towers. NPR is doing a story on the subject and it is scheduled to air Friday morning, 12/6 on Morning Edition and will be carried on NPR stations around the country. If you miss hearing the story, NPR will post the entire Morning Edition show on the NPR website, http://discover.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.jhtml?prgId=3&prgDate=current , by the end of the day. This archive will remain for years. Gerald Winegrad ABC’s Vice-President was interviewed at NPR national headqyarters studio in DC yesterday and should be in the story. Please listen and tell your friends. It would be great to build some national consciousness on this cause of avian mortality. Donald R. Dann Highland Park/Lake County ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C29C80.0124C890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

Hi BCN = friends-

 

The American Bird Conservancy has = been working hard to minimize bird deaths at communication towers.  = NPR is doing a story on the = subject and it is scheduled to air Friday morning, 12/6 on Morning Edition = and will be carried on NPR stations around the country. If you miss = hearing the story, NPR will post the entire Morning Edition show on the NPR website, http://discover.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.jhtml?prgId=3D3&a= mp;prgDate=3Dcurrent, by the end of the day. This archive will remain for years.  Gerald = Winegrad ABC’s Vice-President was interviewed at NPR national headqyarters = studio in DC yesterday and should be in the story.    =

 

Please listen and tell your = friends.  It would be great to build = some national consciousness on this cause of avian = mortality.

 

Donald R. = Dann

Highland Park/Lake County  =

 

------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C29C80.0124C890-- From tsrecord@ripco.com Fri Dec 6 06:19:30 2002 From: tsrecord@ripco.com (Terry Schilling) Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 00:19:30 -0600 Subject: [BCNnet] Jarvis Migratory Bird Sanctuary workday Saturday Dec. 7th Message-ID: <3DF04172.3070109@ripco.com> This Saturday we'll be having a brush cutting, and if there's not too much snow, a seed planting workday at the Jarvis Migratory Bird Sanctuary in Chicago's Lincoln Park (directions below). We start at 9 a.m. and we'll be there until about 2 p.m. Join us when you can! Please dress for the weather. We'll have tools and work gloves, but it's a good idea to bring glove liners if you have them. We'll also have binoculars available to do a little birdwatching during breaks, and refreshments from Ann Sathers. Hope to see you there! Access from the north and west is from Irving Park Road; follow Irving east until it turns south (in the park); go past the tennis courts and take the first road left to the golf course parking lot (just north of the Totem Pole). Access from the south is from the Recreation Drive exit from northbound Lake Shore Drive (the next exit after Belmont). Continue north ("soft" left turn from the stop sign) past the totem pole, then take the first road to the right back to the golf course parking lot. Park on the east side of the parking lot, just after you pull in. Walk down the access road toward the lake; turn right (south) along the fence. We'll meet at the garage just northeast of the Sanctuary. Public transportation, via several CTA bus routes (Addison and the Sheridan Road buses) is also available. There is a pedestrian underpass just north of the Addison - Lake Shore Drive intersection. Terry Schilling -- _________________________________________________________________________ T/S Recording and tsssystems.com provide full service video, audio and music production and post for both traditional media and the Web, along with Web application development, site design and maintenance services. From DAntieau@aol.com Sun Dec 8 19:39:43 2002 From: DAntieau@aol.com (DAntieau@aol.com) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 14:39:43 EST Subject: [BCNnet] Fwd:Results of Montrose Beach Dog Pilot Project Message-ID: <4e.1523f172.2b24f9ff@aol.com> --part1_4e.1523f172.2b24f9ff_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bird People: =A0 I recently=A0inquired about the result=A0of the Chicago Park District's=20 two-month=A0long Montrose Dog Beach Pilot Project, which=A0ended on November= 1,=20 2002.=A0=A0I=A0understand this information has not been posted on the chat l= ines.=A0=20 Please=A0pardon the redundancy if=A0it has. =A0 After evaluating the=A0pilot, the Chicago Park District has made the decisio= n=20 to continue to allow off-leash dog access on Montrose Beach within the newly= =20 fenced area at the north=A0end (next to the former Wilson boat=20 launch)=A0throughout the year. =A0 Dogs will not be allowed=A0on or off-leash=A0on the remaining portion of=A0M= ontrose=20 Beach=A0AT ANY TIME.=A0 Signs with maps will be posted along the beach to cl= early=20 communicate this information.=A0 The message 'no dogs allowed'=A0is already=20 posted on the signs in the dune habitat protection area. =A0 Also of interest,=A0the City Council has raised the fine for off-leash dogs=20= to=20 $300.=A0=A0The fine is citywide.=A0I=A0was told that the best way to report=20 violations of the dog ordinance is to=A0call=A0311, the Chicago Police=20 non-emergency=A0number.=A0=A0 =A0 Best wishes to all for a=A0safe and joyful holiday season! =A0 Leslie Borns birdperson@juno.com Chicago/Cook --part1_4e.1523f172.2b24f9ff_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bird People:
=A0
I recently=A0inquired about the result=A0of the Chicago Park District's=20= two-month=A0long Montrose Dog Beach Pilot Project, which=A0ended on November= 1, 2002.=A0=A0I=A0understand this information has not been posted on the ch= at lines.=A0 Please=A0pardon the redundancy if=A0it has.
=A0
After evaluating the=A0pilot, the Chicago Park District has made the dec= ision to continue to allow off-leash dog access on Montrose Beach within the= newly fenced area at the north=A0end (next to the former Wilson boat launch= )=A0throughout the year.
=A0
Dogs will not be allowed=A0on or off-leash=A0on the remaining portion of= =A0Montrose Beach=A0AT ANY TIME.=A0 Signs with maps will be posted along the= beach to clearly communicate this information.=A0 The message 'no dogs allo= wed'=A0is already posted on the signs in the dune habitat protection area.
=A0
Also of interest,=A0the City Council has raised the fine for off-leash d= ogs to $300.=A0=A0The fine is citywide.=A0I=A0was told that the best way to=20= report violations of the dog ordinance is to=A0call=A0311, the Chicago Polic= e non-emergency=A0number.=A0=A0
=A0
Best wishes to all for a=A0safe and joyful holiday season!
=A0
Leslie Borns
birdperson@juno.com
Chicago/Cook
--part1_4e.1523f172.2b24f9ff_boundary-- From ISSUESMAN@aol.com Wed Dec 11 01:51:01 2002 From: ISSUESMAN@aol.com (ISSUESMAN@aol.com) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:51:01 EST Subject: [BCNnet] Springbrook Prairie Success Story Message-ID: --part1_a2.30587684.2b27f405_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit THE VALUE OF GOOD DATA AND GOOD LAND MANAGERS I have been monitoring bird populations at Springbrook Prairie since 1994 and have been the Volunteer Steward for the DuPage Forest Preserve District for several years. We probably always wonder if we are doing any good or if the information that we collect is valuable. I am happy to report that our efforts can pay off and are very valuable, at least here in DuPage. Recently I learned that a proposed limestone trail was planned to go through one of the fields at Springbrook. From my monitoring data, the path of the proposed trail bisected habitat with the greatest diversity and density of grassland birds and the center of the Henslow's Sparrow population on the site (for those of you familiar with Springbrook this is the large fescue field west of Book Road and north of the stream). I called my contacts at DuPage and told them of my concerns. To make a long story short, DuPage Forest preserve staff recognized the problem and took action to reroute the proposed trail south of the field. They did this despite the fact that the stakes to mark the trail were already in the field and construction is slated to start soon. Kudos go to District staff John Oldenburg of the Natural Resources Department and Bob Vick of the Planning and Development Department for listening and taking immediate action to remedy the problem. I am very happy to report that they recognized the value of the natural resource and took action to protect it. Two points - without the data that I have been collecting over the years to document the bird populations and the location of threatened species on the site, DuPage County could have lost a significant breeding population of grassland birds. You can't protect what you don't know is there. Second, this is a great example of how volunteer efforts can support and inform decisions on our remaining public lands. It was great to get the cooperation and efforts of DuPage staff to resolve the problem. If you have an opportunity to do so, please express your thanks to John and Bob for their efforts. Also, a note or email of thanks and support to Dewey Pierotti, DuPage Forest Preserve President, is in order. I think it is important that they hear from us when something good happens and not only when we have something to complain about. It was a good feeling to know that we can help save some of our natural heritage through our work and the concerns of our professional land managers. Joe Suchecki Naperville --part1_a2.30587684.2b27f405_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit THE VALUE OF GOOD DATA AND GOOD LAND MANAGERS

I have been monitoring bird populations at Springbrook Prairie since 1994 and have been the Volunteer Steward for the DuPage Forest Preserve District for several years.  We probably always wonder if we are doing any good or if the information that we collect is valuable.  I am happy to report that our efforts can pay off and are very valuable, at least here in DuPage.

Recently I learned that a proposed limestone trail was planned to go through one of the fields at Springbrook.  From my monitoring data, the path of the proposed trail bisected habitat with the greatest diversity and density of grassland birds and the center of the Henslow's Sparrow population on the site (for those of you familiar with Springbrook this is the large fescue field west of Book Road and north of the stream).  I called my contacts at DuPage and told them of my concerns.   To make a long story short, DuPage Forest preserve staff recognized the problem and took action to reroute the proposed trail south of the field.  They did this despite the fact that the stakes to mark the trail were already in the field and construction is slated to start soon.

Kudos go to District staff John Oldenburg of the Natural Resources Department and Bob Vick of the Planning and Development Department for listening and taking immediate action to remedy the problem.  I am very happy to report that they recognized the value of the natural resource and took action to protect it.

Two points - without the data that I have been collecting over the years to document the bird populations and the location of threatened species on the site, DuPage County could have lost a significant breeding  population of grassland birds.  You can't protect what you don't know is there.

Second, this is a great example of how volunteer efforts can support and inform decisions on our remaining public lands.  It was great to get the cooperation and efforts of DuPage staff  to resolve the problem.

If you have an opportunity to do so, please express your thanks to John and Bob for their efforts.  Also, a note or email of thanks and support to Dewey Pierotti, DuPage Forest Preserve President, is in order.  I think it is important that they hear from us when something good happens and not only when we have something to complain about.

It was a good feeling to know that we can help save some of our natural heritage through our work and the concerns of our professional land managers.

Joe Suchecki
Naperville 
--part1_a2.30587684.2b27f405_boundary-- From bobolnk@ix.netcom.com Wed Dec 11 14:40:09 2002 From: bobolnk@ix.netcom.com (Judy Pollock) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:40:09 -0600 Subject: [BCNnet] Species Recovery Funds Message-ID: <20021211152011.635B210DE67@southwark.dsl.net> FYI... NWF's Keep the Wild Alive Project Offers Species Recovery Fund Grants for 2003 The National Wildlife Federation's Keep the Wild Alive project is kicking off the fourth year of its very successful Species Recovery Fund (SRF). KWA is now accepting applications from local conservation and other groups with innovative ideas for helping imperiled species. In 2003, Keep the Wild Alive will award ten grants ranging from $3,000 to $7,000. Applications must be received by February 15, 2003, and grants will be awarded in April 2003. Over the past three years, SRF has awarded roughly 30 small grants to local, grassroots groups that are making a tangible contribution to species conservation. This year, SRF will support grassroots efforts that aim to improve on-the-ground conditions for any species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). This is a significant change for SRF, which for the past three years has funded only projects benefitting one of the 25 Keep the Wild Alive species or taxonomically related species. Please help KWA spread the word about SRF by passing this information, including the new guidelines, when appropriate, to any groups or individuals you know who are working on the preservation of endangered species. Complete information for SRF can be found at www.nwf.org/wildalive and obtained from KWA coordinator, Emy Rodriguez (email erodriguez@nwf.org, Ph: 202-797-6617). Please contact her with any questions, she loves nothing more than to answer your questions about the Species Recovery Fund! From Karolyn Beebe" The following request came in from the Dept of Defense -Partners in Flight program. To see any reports they may have about your area, click on What's New at the bottom of : http://www.dodpif.org/site.htm Karolyn Beebe - Madison WI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Eberly" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: Fwd: 103rd Christmas Bird Count to Begin this Saturday > I would like to know of all Christmas Bird Count circles > that include military lands. If you know of a CBC in this > category, can you please send me the following: > - count (circle) name > - installation name > - count compiler > > Thank you very much, and enjoy this year's CBC. > - Chris > ceberly@dodpif.org > 540-253-5675 > > -------- Original Message -------- > > AUDUBON INVITES BIRDERS AND NATURE > ENTHUSIASTS TO TAKE PART IN 103rd > ANNUAL CHRISTMAS BIRD COUNT > > Count Organizers Hope to Document the Possible > Impacts of West Nile Virus on Crows, Owls and Raptors > See the press release at: > http://www.audubon.org/news/press_releases/ From sdevore@voyager.net Fri Dec 13 15:49:28 2002 From: sdevore@voyager.net (Sheryl DeVore) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 07:49:28 -0800 Subject: [BCNnet] Project assistance request: European Starlings Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C2A27C.29E96040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello IBETers and BCNeters, I am forwarding this message from Bill Mueller, who lives just over the northern Illinos border in Milwaukee. He is doing a research project and could use your help. Look for an article by Bill about the declining population of Red-headed Woodpeckers in a future issue of Meadowlark: A Journal of ILlinois Birds. Bill's Email address follows this request. >From Bill Mueller: Request for assistance with new research project: A number of cavity-nesting birds have declining populations. These include the Red-headed Woodpecker, Northern Flicker, and Purple Martin.Other species continue to need human assistance to maintain or increase their populations (Eastern Bluebird is a prime example). One factor implicated in the population declines of these cavity-nesting birds is "interference competition" with the European Starling. Please consider assisting with a new multi-year research project, which has the objective of determining the effect of starlings as competitors for nest cavities. This research would require observation of existing nest cavities or nest boxes. New nest boxes for various species (especially the Northern Flicker) can be constructed and monitored as part of this project, if desired. If this option is chosen, data from this project can be additionally provided to existing research efforts such as the Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s Birdhouse Network. This project is in the planning stage, and I would like to determine if a sufficient number of cooperators/participants would be interested. If you would consider assisting with this effort, please write to me backchannel, and I will supply further information and add your name to the list of possible cooperators. Thanks in advance for your help! Bill Mueller iltlawas@earthlink.net Milwaukee Sheryl De Vore sdevore@voyager.net Mundelein, Illinois ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C2A27C.29E96040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello = IBETers and=20 BCNeters, I am forwarding this message from Bill Mueller, who lives just = over=20 the northern Illinos border in Milwaukee. He is doing a research project = and=20 could use your help. Look for an article by Bill about the = declining=20 population of Red-headed Woodpeckers in a future issue of Meadowlark: A = Journal=20 of ILlinois Birds. Bill's Email address follows this = request.

From = Bill=20 Mueller:

 

Request for assistance with new research=20 project: A number of = cavity-nesting birds=20 have declining populations. These

include the Red-headed Woodpecker, = Northern Flicker,=20 and Purple Martin.Other species continue to need human assistance to = maintain or=20 increase their populations = (Eastern=20 Bluebird is a prime example). One factor=20 implicated in the population declines of these cavity-nesting = birds=20 is "interference competition" = with the=20 European Starling. Please consider=20 assisting with a new multi-year research project, which has = the objective of determining the effect = of=20 starlings as competitors for nest=20 cavities. This research would require observation of existing = nest cavities or nest boxes. New nest = boxes for=20 various species (especially the = Northern=20 Flicker) can be constructed and monitored as part of this project, if desired. If this option = is chosen,=20 data from this project can be = additionally=20 provided to existing research efforts such as the=20 Cornell Lab of Ornithology=92s Birdhouse Network.

This project is in the planning stage, = and I would=20 like to determine if a = sufficient number=20 of cooperators/participants would be interested. If you would consider assisting with = this effort,=20 please write to me backchannel, = and I will=20 supply further information and add your name to=20 the list of possible cooperators. Thanks in advance for your=20 help!

Bill Mueller

iltlawas@earthlink.net

Milwaukee

Sheryl De = Vore
sdevore@voyager.net
Mundelein, = Illinois
 
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C2A27C.29E96040-- From csnp@uic.edu Mon Dec 16 15:57:13 2002 From: csnp@uic.edu (Dennis Nyberg) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:57:13 -0600 Subject: [BCNnet] Springbrook Prairie Story Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20021216095428.02767900@mailserv.uic.edu> --=====================_86847674==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed It is well that a trail has NOT been built thru prime grassland bird habitat. Among bird species, grassland birds are meritorious of the highest level of protection in Illinois. I am replying because I think the statement, "You can't protect what you don't know is there." deserves to be explored. We know from a variety of studies and direct observations that trails replace plants with an impervious surface. This has been written about and observed a sufficient number of times that by induction environmentalists accept that a trail or a road is going to have a negative effect on a lot more species than positive effects. We do not need to restudy this issue at every single site (though requesting such is the strategy of "wise use" and some local groups that seek to reduce management). This I feel comfortable that asserting that preventing human economic activity from an area (including trail and shelter construction) will indeed protect the plants and animals living on the land without me knowing specifically what I am protecting. Knowing what is being protected is nice, but can be reliably inferred from a quick look at the habitat by an even a weak naturalist. Specifically, if one has an Illinois field without any significant woody vegetation (this is where experience helps) that is greater than 25 acres one assumes that grassland birds nest at the site (unless a specific inventory indicates contrary information). Induction of experience leads to such a statement. I would also note that in the case described no information on what was living in where the rerouted trail was put is presented. Without such information, I am left to wonder if, perhaps, the last nesting place of snapping turtles in Dupage county is being destroyed. Given only the option is that the trail WILL be built, it is appropriate to "know what is there" before deciding where to place the trail. Unfortunately, there are a lot of kinds of species living a lot of different life styles. Basing our decision on a single group is perhaps better than ignoring all groups, but I would need to know lots about the place that ended up taking the hit of the trail before I could congratulate the FPDDC for moving the trail. Dennis Nyberg At 08:51 PM 12/10/2002 -0500, you wrote: THE VALUE OF GOOD DATA AND GOOD LAND MANAGERS I have been monitoring bird populations at Springbrook Prairie since 1994 and have been the Volunteer Steward for the DuPage Forest Preserve District for several years. We probably always wonder if we are doing any good or if the information that we collect is valuable. I am happy to report that our efforts can pay off and are very valuable, at least here in DuPage. Recently I learned that a proposed limestone trail was planned to go through one of the fields at Springbrook. From my monitoring data, the path of the proposed trail bisected habitat with the greatest diversity and density of grassland birds and the center of the Henslow's Sparrow population on the site (for those of you familiar with Springbrook this is the large fescue field west of Book Road and north of the stream). I called my contacts at DuPage and told them of my concerns. To make a long story short, DuPage Forest preserve staff recognized the problem and took action to reroute the proposed trail south of the field. They did this despite the fact that the stakes to mark the trail were already in the field and construction is slated to start soon. Kudos go to District staff John Oldenburg of the Natural Resources Department and Bob Vick of the Planning and Development Department for listening and taking immediate action to remedy the problem. I am very happy to report that they recognized the value of the natural resource and took action to protect it. Two points - without the data that I have been collecting over the years to document the bird populations and the location of threatened species on the site, DuPage County could have lost a significant breeding population of grassland birds. You can't protect what you don't know is there. Second, this is a great example of how volunteer efforts can support and inform decisions on our remaining public lands. It was great to get the cooperation and efforts of DuPage staff to resolve the problem. If you have an opportunity to do so, please express your thanks to John and Bob for their efforts. Also, a note or email of thanks and support to Dewey Pierotti, DuPage Forest Preserve President, is in order. I think it is important that they hear from us when something good happens and not only when we have something to complain about. It was a good feeling to know that we can help save some of our natural heritage through our work and the concerns of our professional land managers. Joe Suchecki Naperville --=====================_86847674==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" It is well that a trail has NOT been built thru prime grassland bird habitat. Among bird species, grassland birds are meritorious of the highest level of protection in Illinois.
I am replying because I think the statement, "You can't protect what you don't know is there." deserves to be explored.
We know from a variety of studies and direct observations that trails replace plants with an impervious surface. This has been written about and observed a sufficient number of times that by induction environmentalists accept that a trail or a road is going to have a negative effect on a lot more species than positive effects. We do not need to restudy this issue at every single site (though requesting such is the strategy of "wise use" and some local groups that seek to reduce management).  This I feel comfortable that asserting that preventing human economic activity from an area (including trail and shelter construction) will indeed protect the plants and animals living on the land without me knowing specifically what I am protecting.
Knowing what is being protected is nice, but can be reliably inferred from a quick look at the habitat by an even a weak naturalist. Specifically, if one has an Illinois field without any significant woody vegetation (this is where experience helps) that is greater than 25 acres one assumes that grassland birds nest at the site (unless a specific inventory indicates contrary information). Induction of experience leads to such a statement.
I would also note that in the case described no information on what was living in where the rerouted trail was put is presented. Without such information, I am left to wonder if, perhaps, the last nesting place of snapping turtles in Dupage county is being destroyed. Given only the option is that the trail WILL be built, it is appropriate to "know what is there" before deciding where to place the trail. Unfortunately, there are a lot of kinds of species living a lot of different life styles. Basing our decision on a single group is perhaps better than ignoring all groups, but I would need to know lots about the place that ended up taking the hit of the trail before I could congratulate the FPDDC for moving the trail.
Dennis Nyberg
At 08:51 PM 12/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
THE VALUE OF GOOD DATA AND GOOD LAND MANAGERS

I have been monitoring bird populations at Springbrook Prairie since 1994 and have been the Volunteer Steward for the DuPage Forest Preserve District for several years.  We probably always wonder if we are doing any good or if the information that we collect is valuable.  I am happy to report that our efforts can pay off and are very valuable, at least here in DuPage.

Recently I learned that a proposed limestone trail was planned to go through one of the fields at Springbrook.  From my monitoring data, the path of the proposed trail bisected habitat with the greatest diversity and density of grassland birds and the center of the Henslow's Sparrow population on the site (for those of you familiar with Springbrook this is the large fescue field west of Book Road and north of the stream).  I called my contacts at DuPage and told them of my concerns.   To make a long story short, DuPage Forest preserve staff recognized the problem and took action to reroute the proposed trail south of the field.  They did this despite the fact that the stakes to mark the trail were already in the field and construction is slated to start soon.

Kudos go to District staff John Oldenburg of the Natural Resources Department and Bob Vick of the Planning and Development Department for listening and taking immediate action to remedy the problem.  I am very happy to report that they recognized the value of the natural resource and took action to protect it.

Two points - without the data that I have been collecting over the years to document the bird populations and the location of threatened species on the site, DuPage County could have lost a significant breeding  population of grassland birds.  You can't protect what you don't know is there.

Second, this is a great example of how volunteer efforts can support and inform decisions on our remaining public lands.  It was great to get the cooperation and efforts of DuPage staff  to resolve the problem.

If you have an opportunity to do so, please express your thanks to John and Bob for their efforts.  Also, a note or email of thanks and support to Dewey Pierotti, DuPage Forest Preserve President, is in order.  I think it is important that they hear from us when something good happens and not only when we have something to complain about.

It was a good feeling to know that we can help save some of our natural heritage through our work and the concerns of our professional land managers.

Joe Suchecki
Naperville 
--=====================_86847674==_.ALT-- From donniebird@yahoo.com Fri Dec 20 15:56:13 2002 From: donniebird@yahoo.com (Donald R. Dann) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:56:13 -0600 Subject: [BCNnet] A brief, interesting note for the quail and sparrow lovers among us... Message-ID: <005601c2a840$533b1730$7f67f90c@donnie> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C2A80E.08A0A730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit George Fenwick, ABC’s Executive Director, forwarded this to me and I thought it would of interest. Donald R. Dann Highland Park/Lake County ----- Original Message ----- From: Clifford Shackelford To: Robert Perez (rperez@gvec.net) ; Brent Ortego (wk) (Brent Ortego (wk)) ; Carl Frentress (Carl Frentress) ; Gary Waggerman (Gary Waggerman) ; John Burk (jburk@sfasu.edu) ; Kevin Kraii (kevinkraai@aol.com) ; Vernon Bevill ; Bill Johnson ; Craig Farquhar ; Dave Morrison ; Jay Roberson ; Jeff Raasch ; John Herron ; John Maresh ; Paul Robertson ; Steve Cordts ; Steve DeMaso Cc: Jim Neal (Jim Neal) ; Randy Wilson (Randy Wilson) ; Nathan Garner ; David Pashley (David Pashley) ; Ray Telfair ; George Fenwick (George Fenwick) ; Jason Singhurst ; Jeff Reid (Jeff Reid) ; Ricky Maxey (Ricky Maxey) Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:10 PM Subject: Bobwhite and Bachman's Sparrow in East Texas TPWD all-bird folk, I thought this was worth sharing. I just reviewed the galley of a paper coming out soon. The study was done in the West Gulf Coastal Plain (WGCP) of Texas (e.g., Angelina, Jasper, and San Augustine cos). All species of birds were surveyed in mature pine forests on national forest land occupied by Red-cockaded Woodpeckers (RCW) that were either: (a) managed with prescribed fire to maintain a diverse grass-forb ground cover, or (b) fire suppressed, thus included a dense hardwood midstory and understory (a.k.a. our "controls"). An equal number of plots of these two habitat-types were surveyed. Two ground-dwelling species in particular stood out in the results -- and it's no secret which ones. You guessed it, the Northern Bobwhite and Bachman's Sparrow. Can you now guess which habitat-type from the two choices above they both occurred in? Yep, you got it -- the one maintained with periodic disturbance in the form of fire (see habitat a above). These two species were completely absent from the controls (habitat b). I remember an article authored by David Pashley and George Fenwick awhile back on what they called the "odd couples". The authors paired-up a game bird and a nongame bird that both depended on the exact same habitat somewhere in the U.S. -- syntopic species and a very neat exercise. The article demonstrated how management for one species can benefit other species as well. It actually appeared in print at least twice -- if memory serves me, it was first in the American Bird Conservancy's magazine "Bird Conservation" and then in the American Birding Association's magazine "Birding". The authors included this quail and sparrow as one of these so-called "odd couples". Sharing the same habitat-type is well documented across the Southeast where these two birds occur together. The bottom-line is that these two declining species benefit from management of the federally endangered RCW, but ONLY if prescribed burning is employed in these pine forests. This, again, was no mystery to most ecologists, but it needed to be tested in the WGCP. Just a brief visit to these two forest- types would make it abundantly clear to most bird biologists that this quail and sparrow would not select one of the control sites as a place to call home. Unfortunately, there are environmental groups who continuously preach anti-fire sentiments on public lands. As if the contemporary suppression of fire across the country isn't enough! John Burk wrote a great article on all this in the last issue of the TX PIF FLYWAY Newsletter found here < http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/nature/birding/flyway_news/index.htm >. Click on Volume 9 and scroll down to page 13 -- it's worth reading, if you haven't done so already. Sorry, John, Wild Turkeys were not found in the WGCP bird study. If they had been, your money and my money would be on the turkeys occurring in the burned, open habitat (seasonally, not annually). Now some recent, pertinent East Texas data exist for the environmental groups who might mean well, but area unknowingly assisting in the decline of many species dependent on the effects of fire -- not to mention a whole host of other animals and micro-communities (i.e., pitcher plant bogs) that are declining in the face of almost complete fire elimination. In case you're interested, the full citation of the forthcoming paper is: Conner, R. N., C. E. Shackelford, R. R. Schaefer, D. Saenz, and D. C. Rudolph. 2002. Avian Community Response to Southern Pine Ecosystem Restoration for Red-cockaded Woodpeckers. Wilson Bulletin 114(3):324-332. Watch for it to come out in a few months. Feel free to pass this message along to others who might be interested in the topic. Cheers, Cliff ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C2A80E.08A0A730 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

George Fenwick, ABC’s Executive Director, forwarded this = to me and I thought it would of interest.

 

Donald R. Dann

Highland Park/Lake County 

 

 

----- Original Message -----=20

To: Robert Perez (rperez@gvec.net) ; Brent Ortego (wk) (Brent Ortego (wk)) ; Carl Frentress (Carl Frentress) ; Gary Waggerman (Gary = Waggerman) ; John Burk = (jburk@sfasu.edu) ; Kevin Kraii (kevinkraai@aol.com) ; Vernon Bevill ; Bill Johnson ; Craig Farquhar ; Dave Morrison ; Jay Roberson ; Jeff Raasch ; John Herron ; John Maresh ; Paul Robertson ; Steve Cordts ; Steve DeMaso

Cc: Jim Neal (Jim = Neal) ; Randy Wilson (Randy = Wilson) ; Nathan Garner ; David Pashley (David Pashley) ; Ray Telfair = ; George Fenwick (George = Fenwick) ; Jason Singhurst ; Jeff Reid (Jeff = Reid) ; Ricky Maxey (Ricky = Maxey)

Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:10 PM

Subject: Bobwhite and Bachman's Sparrow in East = Texas

 

TPWD all-bird = folk, <= /p>

I thought this was worth = sharing.  <= /p>

I just reviewed the galley of a = paper coming out soon.  The study was done in the West Gulf Coastal Plain = (WGCP) of Texas (e.g., Angelina, Jasper, and San Augustine cos).  All = species of birds were surveyed in mature pine forests on national forest land = occupied by Red-cockaded Woodpeckers (RCW) that were either: (a) managed with = prescribed fire to maintain a diverse grass-forb ground cover, or (b) fire = suppressed, thus included a dense hardwood midstory and understory (a.k.a. our "controls").  An equal number of plots of these two = habitat-types were surveyed.

Two ground-dwelling species in particular stood out in the results -- and it's no secret which = ones.  You guessed it, the Northern Bobwhite and Bachman's Sparrow.  Can you = now guess which habitat-type from the two choices above they both occurred in?  Yep, you got it -- the one maintained with periodic = disturbance in the form of fire (see habitat a above).  These two species were = completely absent from the controls (habitat b).  <= /p>

I remember an article authored by = David Pashley and George Fenwick awhile back on what they called the "odd couples".  The authors paired-up a game bird and a nongame = bird that both depended on the exact same habitat somewhere in the U.S. -- = syntopic species and a very neat exercise.  The article demonstrated how = management for one species can benefit other species as well.  It actually = appeared in print at least twice -- if memory serves me, it was first in the = American Bird Conservancy's magazine "Bird Conservation" and then in = the American Birding Association's magazine "Birding".  The = authors included this quail and sparrow as one of these so-called "odd couples".  Sharing the same habitat-type is well documented = across the Southeast where these two birds occur together.  = <= /p>

The bottom-line is that these two = declining species benefit from management of the federally endangered RCW, but = ONLY if prescribed burning is employed in these pine forests.  This, again, = was no mystery to most ecologists, but it needed to be tested in the = WGCP.  Just a brief visit to these two forest-types would make it abundantly clear = to most bird biologists that this quail and sparrow would not select one of the = control sites as a place to call home.  <= /p>

Unfortunately, there are = environmental groups who continuously preach anti-fire sentiments on public = lands.  As if the contemporary suppression of fire across the country isn't = enough!  John Burk wrote a great article on all this in the last issue of the TX = PIF FLYWAY Newsletter found here <http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/nature/birding/flyway_news/index.htm>.  Click on Volume 9 and scroll down = to page 13 -- it's worth reading, if you haven't done so already.  = Sorry, John, Wild Turkeys were not found in the WGCP bird study.  If they = had been, your money and my money would be on the turkeys occurring in the = burned, open habitat (seasonally, not annually).<= /p>

Now some recent, pertinent East = Texas data exist for the environmental groups who might mean well, but area = unknowingly assisting in the decline of many species dependent on the effects of = fire -- not to mention a whole host of other animals and micro-communities = (i.e., pitcher plant bogs) that are declining in the face of almost complete = fire elimination. 

In case you're interested, the = full citation of the forthcoming paper is:  Conner, R. N., C. E. = Shackelford, R. R. Schaefer, D. Saenz, and D. C. Rudolph.  2002.  Avian = Community Response to Southern Pine Ecosystem Restoration for Red-cockaded = Woodpeckers.  Wilson Bulletin 114(3):324-332.  Watch for it to come out in a few = months.<= /p>

Feel free to pass this message = along to others who might be interested in the topic.

Cheers,

Cliff
= <= /p>

 

------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C2A80E.08A0A730-- From Heaton.Duane@epamail.epa.gov Mon Dec 23 14:08:59 2002 From: Heaton.Duane@epamail.epa.gov (Heaton.Duane@epamail.epa.gov) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 08:08:59 -0600 Subject: [BCNnet] Lake Erie Bird Deaths from Botulism Type E Message-ID: BCNnet: I've pasted below a message from Ward Stone of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. It came to me with attachments; I copied/pasted the list of birds, but not the stomach contents. Duane Heaton Palatine, IL ____________________________________ Here is a short update on Botulism at Lake Erie: 1. We have received 6,519 birds (see attached summary) from Lake Erie so far in 2002. More birds have been picked up by Jason Telecky and the numbers will grow. 2. The warm weather of the last four days has cleared some snow and ice from Lake Erie beach areas and has freed up some frozen birds. I think that there are hundreds of Botulism-killed birds yet to pick up. Some fresh cases in gulls seem to still be occurring. This isn't surprising, since there still are carcasses of Botulism-killed birds to scavenge. It is probable that, with the present ecological conditions, Botulinum Type E mortalities, are with us in Lake Erie through most if not all of the year. They are very low in winter and spring and pick up in the summer and fall. The heaviest mortalities in water birds comes when migration brings them to Lake Erie in the fall. 3. Attached is a table summarizing Joe Okoniewski's work to date on the stomach contents of water birds dying of Type E Botulism at Lake Erie. The predominant mussel being investigated by far is the Quagga. 4. It appears that the Red-eared slider, and perhaps other species of turtle, have some (perhaps considerable) resistance to Type E Botulinum toxin. Further research should soon clarify this. |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Species |10/31-12/19|01/01-10/30| Total | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Bufflehead | 1 | | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Cormorant (unspecified) | 7 | | 7 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Cormorant, Double-crested | 11 | | 11 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Crow, American | | 9 | 9 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Duck, Long-tailed | 4750 | 24 | 4774 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Duck, Unidentified | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Duck, Wood | 1 | 1 | 2 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gadwall | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Goldeneye | 1 | | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Goose, Canada | 2 | 10 | 12 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Grackle, Common | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Grebe (unspecified) | 42 | | 42 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Grebe, Horned | 84 | 1 | 85 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Grebe, Red-necked | 4 | | 4 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gull (unspecified) | 8 | 7 | 15 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gull, Bonaparte's | 24 | 1 | 25 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gull, Greater Black-backed | 13 | 9 | 22 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gull, Herring | 134 | 34 | 168 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gull, Lesser Black-backed | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gull, Ring-billed | 72 | 115 | 187 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Gull, Sabines | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Hawk, Cooper's | 1 | | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Hawk, Red-tailed | 1 | | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Heron, Great Blue | 3 | 1 | 4 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Loon, Common | 411 | 8 | 419 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Mallard | 2 | 2 | 4 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Martin, Purple | | 2 | 2 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Merganser (unspecified) | 226 | | 226 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Merganser, Common | 4 | 1 | 5 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Merganser, Red-breasted | 450 | 1 | 451 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Owl, Eatern Screech | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Owl, Saw-whet | 1 | | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Robin, American | 1 | 1 | 2 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Sanderling | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Sandpiper | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Scaup, Greater | 12 | | 12 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Scaup, Lesser | 1 | | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Scoter(unspecified) | 2 | | 2 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Scoter, Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Scoter, White-winged | 9 | | 9 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Sparrow, House | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Swallow, Barn | | 1 | 1 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| |Swan, Mute | | 2 | 2 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------| | Total| 6279 | 240 | 6519 | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------+--------|